Friday, March 14, 2008

WAVE Runs Leaders

Using the WAVE projections for batters, here are the top 25 players in Runs, ranked in order.

rank

player

runs

rank

player

runs

1

Alex Rodriguez

132

14

Kosuke Fukudome

112

2

Jimmy Rollins

131

14

BJ Upton

112

3

Curtis Granderson

125

16

Ichiro Suzuki

111

3

Hanley Ramirez

125

16

Dan Uggla

111

5

Alex Rios

120

18

Ryan Braun

110

5

Grady Sizemore

120

18

Derek Jeter

110

5

Chase Utley

120

18

Albert Pujols

110

8

Michael Bourn

117

21

Gary Sheffield

109

9

David Ortiz

116

22

Kelly Johnson

108

10

Jose Reyes

115

22

Shane Victorino

108

10

Troy Tulowitzki

115

24

Hideki Matsui

107

12

Bobby Abreu

114

24

David Wright

107

12

Matt Holliday

114

25

Chipper Jones

106


Analysis:
  • Michael Bourn is being under-valued, and under-projected (a term I just made up). Houston is committed to hitting Bourn at the top of their potent offense, making 100+ runs scored a lock. He doesn't have to hit for a very high AVG to provide fantasy value, as the runs and stolen bases should be there regardless.
  • Fukudome's WAVE projection of 112 runs scored was based on Lou Piniella's inclination to bat him near the top of the Cubs lineup, right where his OBP bat belongs. However, in recent days, Sweet Lou has decided that Ryan Theriot will hit at the top of the lineup, with Kosuke moving down to the 5th spot. Not a good move for the Cubs. As a result, Fukudome may score significantly less runs than projected. Piniella is known for being pretty fickle, so Kosuke could certainly move back up where he belongs at some point during the season.
  • Only Dan Uggla and Chase Utley are projected to score more runs at second base this season than Kelly Johnson. The potential for 20 HR is also there, and KJ is being taken as late as the 14th round in some drafts.
  • Shane Victorino isn't getting the love he deserves, as a potential 4 category player in '08.
  • Chipper Jones and Gary Sheffield are both risky run scorers due to recent health issues.

0 comments: